Monday, June 28, 2010

To flush or not to flush, that is the (pissing) question!

Photo: Dan ForbesPhoto: Dan Forbes
In a laboratory 10 miles east of downtown Los Angeles, a mechanical penis sputters to life. A technician starts a timer as a stream of water erupts from the apparatus’s brass tip, arcing into a urinal mounted exactly 12 inches away. James Krug smiles. His latest back-splatter experiment is under way.
After that opening, surely you'll want to read the rest of Joshua Davis' wonderful article in Wired magazine, on the technological, social, institutional, political, and environmental ramifications of urinals. Eye-opening stuff about an everyday piece of technology that you probably never think about even as you are quite literally pissing in it. While trying to minimize that back-splatter.

Of course, this applies mainly to us guys, so the waterless urinal only solves half the world's water-wasting problem. Perhaps even less than that, because ladies' rooms don't have urinals and they are likely wasting (for all I know) a larger tankful per flush on a regular toilet - so are there plans to extend these waterless technologies across that gender gap, I wonder?

After all, as my friend Susannah Lerman reminds me (through pictures she just posted on facebook from her recent trip to the middle east), it is possible to have waterless WCs as well:

Pic ©Susannah Lerman
Don't see any water tank or plumbing behind that throne, do you? You wouldn't, because that, my friends, is a composting toilet, from the Lotan Center for Creative Ecology in Kibbutz Lotan near Eilat in the Arava valley of Israel. Now that's something even more likely to get the clog into the plumbers union, eh?

On a lighter note, pondering the gender differences between excretory technologies reminded me of this classic application of the ideal-free distribution model of habitat selection by Dave Barry to a conundrum faced only by guys: which urinal to choose when faced with a row of them along a public restroom wall. Although, I doubt Barry has ever heard of the ideal-free distribution model.

Have I given your week a good start then, with this Monday morning blog post? No? Well, piss-off then!

Read more...

Sunday, June 27, 2010

BP's Next Disaster: You ain't seen nothing yet!!

Illustration by Tim Bower
Rolling Stone is on a roll, exposing one depressing thing after another about this hope and change administration. Here's the latest about what is yet to come from everybody's current favorite big oil company, BP. Some excerpts:
But Obama's tough-guy act offers no guarantee that oil giants like BP won't be permitted to repeat the same mistakes that led to the nightmare in the Gulf. Indeed, top environmentalists warn, the suspension of drilling appears to be little more than a stalling tactic designed to let public anger over BP's spill subside before giving Big Oil the go-ahead to drill in an area that has long been off-limits: the Arctic Ocean. The administration has approved plans by both BP and Shell Oil to drill a total of 11 exploratory wells in the Chukchi and Beaufort Seas above Alaska — waters far more remote and hostile than the Gulf. Shell's operations could proceed as soon as the president's suspension expires in January. And thanks to an odd twist in its rig design, BP's drilling in the Arctic is on track to get the green light as soon as this fall.
...
Ken Salazar, the Interior secretary whose staff allowed BP to drill in the Gulf based on pro-industry rules cooked up during the Bush years, has made no secret of his determination to push the "frontier" of oil drilling into the Arctic. The region's untapped waters are believed to hold as much as 27 billion barrels of oil — an amount that would rival some of the largest oil fields in the Middle East. "Everything I've heard internally, from sources within both the administration and industry, tells me that the administration is all over wanting these guys out in the Arctic Ocean," says Rick Steiner, a top marine scientist in Alaska who helped guide the response to the Exxon Valdez spill. "They're trying to solve this political problem with this Gulf spill in time to get these guys out in the Arctic next summer."
And if that doesn't worry you,
Here's what BP has in store for the Arctic: First, the company will drill two miles beneath its tiny island, which it has christened "Liberty." Then, in an ingenious twist, it will drill sideways for another six to eight miles, until it reaches an offshore reservoir estimated to hold 105 million barrels of oil. This would be the longest "extended reach" well ever attempted, and the effort has required BP to push drilling technology beyond its proven limits. As the most powerful "land-based" oil rig ever built, Liberty requires special pipe to withstand the 105,000 foot-pounds of torque — the equivalent of 50 Mack truck engines — needed to turn the drill. "This is about as sexy as it gets," a top BP official boasted to reporters in 2008. BP, a repeat felon subject to record fines for its willful safety violations, calls the project "one of its biggest challenges to date" — an engineering task made even more dangerous by plans to operate year-round in what the company itself admits is "some of the harshest weather on Earth."

Read more...

Richard Feynman: I love the energetic vibrations of his drummer's hands...

Read more...

Friday, June 25, 2010

Water: a critical source of sustenance and existential angst for cities everywhere



I found the above video via my friend (and once-and-future collaborator) David Lewis' Facebook page, after realizing that he was among the initial recipients of an ULTRA-Exploratory award. More interestingly, his team is also studying questions about urban water use (like us), but in a very different regional context than Fresno-Clovis, as you can see above!

I found this video shortly after a stimulating skype chat with George Hess, at NCSU, who as PI of the Triangle ULTRA project has set up the OpenULTRA wiki to begin some meta-networking across the nascent ULTRA sites. I sure hope fellow scientists at all the other sites are also open to joining the wiki and opening up our research to share ideas and findings with each other, and with the public whose ecologies we are studying.

The Triangle ULTRA is also focused on questions of water use and equity in water distribution - but at a broader institutional level than our individual homeowner focus. And, given that the Triangle refers to the Raleigh-Durham-Chapel Hill Triangle Region of mega urban sprawl in North Carolina, they're dealing with a much larger set of institutions (govt. bodies) than we are in Fresno-Clovis.

So, from what I know, at least 3 of the 19 (?? that we know of?) ULTRA projects are focusing on water issues! I look forward to collaborating with these folks across sites, and being able to make some interesting comparisions in the near future as our projects proceed along parallel paths. And I will continue to share what I can here on this blog too.


Cool, eh?!

Read more...

Resilience in an urban socioecological system: water management as a driver of landscape and biodiversity in the Fresno-Clovis Metropolitan Area, California.

As noted here a couple of weeks ago, I recently received word of being awarded my first National Science Foundation grant for a collaborative project on urban water use and biodiversity here in the growing Fresno-Clovis Metro Area. This is the biggest grant proposal I've ever written, involving as it did 20 collaborators from 4 different institutions (CSU-Fresno, UC Davis, UC Merced, and the local station of the USDA Forest Service) spanning the disciplines/departments of biology, geography, plant sciences, psychology, anthropology, sociology, water technology, political science, natural science, education, and earth and environmental science. Whew!


What did I just try to bite off? - I remember thinking a year ago after hitting that submit button! What on earth did I go and do that for? 

Nevertheless, our proposal got great reviews - just falling short of making it into the first group of 17 projects funded under the Urban Long-Term Research Area Exploratory Award (ULTRA-Ex), but remaining on a "waiting list" pending additional funds. And now, after a long wait, we are actually getting the grant!

So what did we bite off, you ask? Here's an abstract of what we will be chewing on over the next two years - and do keep coming back here for I will try to share what we learn as we go along:

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

Resilience in an urban socioecological system: water management as a driver of landscape and biodiversity in the Fresno-Clovis Metropolitan Area, California.

PI: Madhusudan Katti, California State University, Fresno
Co-PIs: C. Derya Özgöç-Çağlar (CSU-Fresno), Mary L. Cadenasso (UC-Davis), John T. Bushoven (CSUF), Andrew R. Jones (CSUF).

ABSTRACT

Human beings have transformed the Earth into an increasingly urban planet, with nearly half of humanity now living in cities. A city is a unique type of ecosystem where human social, economic, and cultural activities play a prominent role in shaping the landscape, in turn influencing the distribution and abundance of other species, and consequent patterns of biodiversity. The long-term sustainability of cities is of increasing concern as they continue to grow, straining the infrastructure and pushing against environmental constraints on available natural resources. A key natural resource is water, especially in the more rapidly urbanizing arid regions of the world. Understanding water management and use in cities is therefore critical to developing a deeper theoretical understanding of urban ecosystems as well as effective urban policy. The American West faces a water crisis. Drought, urban growth, climate change, and the continued demands of agriculture have combined to heighten the competition among water users, and spurred the search for institutional arrangements to conserve water. A common tool used by governments to regulate and reduce water consumption is the water meter, combined with a use-based pricing structure. In the rapidly urbanizing San Joaquin Valley of California, located in an arid region subject to prolonged drought cycles likely to get exacerbated under regional climate change projections, many cities are now installing meters to reduce household water use. Metering is expected to reduce water availability throughout the urban ecosystem, with residential landscaping choices mediating its effects upon the distribution of plants and animals. Urban land use decisions result from dynamic interactions between institutional and individual level factors. Landscaping and irrigation at any particular residence, for example, is a product of local environmental conditions, the homeowners’ cultural preferences, socioeconomic status, neighborhood dynamics, as well as zoning laws, market conditions, city policies, and county/state/federal government regulations. Since land use is a key determinant of habitat for other species, overall urban biodiversity is strongly driven by the outcome of interactions between these variables, but these interactions remain poorly understood. This project will address the significance of water as a key resource shaping regional patterns of landscape and biodiversity in the Fresno-Clovis Metropolitan Area. Fresno is currently installing water meters and will start charging for use by 2013, while Clovis has been doing so for almost a century. This contrast in water policies between the two cities provides a unique comparative experimental opportunity to study the impact of metering on human landscaping choices and consequent patterns of urban biodiversity. The objectives of this project are to analyze and contrast current patterns of water use in these cities, focusing on: 1) institutional policy and decision making regarding metering, 2) individual homeowner decision making about landscaping, 3) landscape structure at multiple spatial scales, and, 4) patterns in the distribution of plant and bird diversity. The study relies on a range of methods from multiple disciplines including field observations, institutional and individual homeowner surveys, face-to-face interviews with stakeholders, geographical information systems, remote sensing, global positioning systems, statistical tools, systems modeling, and advanced computer visualization techniques. In addition to addressing many fundamental ecological and socioeconomic questions, the research will be tightly integrated with the education of undergraduate and graduate students, and a strong citizen science component built upon the ongoing Fresno Bird Count project.

The project will have significant implications for urban socio-ecological theory, methodology, and application.  In terms of theory, this project will shed light on complex dynamics of interrelated processes among government regulatory policies, human behavior, landscape and habitat structure, and plant and bird distribution at multiple spatial and temporal scales. In terms of methodology, the research will integrate multidisciplinary methods and advanced technologies to investigate the complexity of the study system, leveraging a “natural” experiment occurring due to Fresno’s installation of water meters, and involving citizen scientist participation in data gathering. With respect to application, the project will provide practical information for urban governance by measuring the impact of a common regulatory tool on citizen behavior, and resulting impacts on landscape and biodiversity. Understanding the relationships among institutions, individual citizens, and biodiversity will help guide urban planning towards more sustainable, resilient, and environmentally healthy cities, in the region and throughout the world. This project is supported by an Urban Long-Term Research Area Exploratory Award.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------

The above "public" abstract is the one that will appear on NSF's website after they've completed the paperwork to start our grant. Our proposal, ofcourse, had the usual, more technical, Project Summary, which you can read/download below the fold.

Read more...

Gasland: a magical world where you can set your tapwater aflame! Thank you oil companies!

Josh Fox, the man behind the camera for this HBO documentary, was interviewed on the Daily Show a couple of days ago:

Posted via email from a leaf warbler's gleanings

Read more...

Genie Scott on the Evolution of Creationism

How has creationism changed over the years? How have beliefs--and tactics--changed? What's the genesis of "intelligent design" and does it truly challenge the foundations of evolutionary biology? Genie Scott discusses the history of creationism and new tactics coming round the bend. From a talk given at North Dakota State University, 2/11/2010.

Posted via email from Darwin's Bulldogs

Read more...

Thursday, June 24, 2010

Dating tips for the LBJ-challenged wader

I just discovered this new series of bird cartoons on Kolkata Birds! Check out the rest. And join me in looking forward to more...

Never heard of an LBJ? Here you go.

[Hat-tip: Dharm Khandal]

Posted via email from a leaf warbler's gleanings

Read more...

How about some Urban Science Adventures on your telly?

That's what my blogger friend and freshly minted urban ecologist Danielle Lee wants to do - bring some urban science to your living room. And she's trying to catch Oprah's eye to do so! Here's her audition tape for Oprah's "Your Own Show" competition:

Go vote for her!

Posted via email from a leaf warbler's gleanings

Read more...

Monday, June 21, 2010

Dangle your baby over the maws of a crocodile... for good luck!?!


via cnn.com

What an odd species we are, really, to come up with so many weird ways to relate with other animals! On the plus side, perhaps the Sheedis (unlike other Muslims) have no problem with evolution? Although they may have an odd model where lice can grow (evolve?) into crocodiles...


[Hat-tip: Stephen Ervin via email]

Read more...

Saturday, June 19, 2010

Want to rescue oil-soaked wildlife? There's an app that can help!

peopleiPhone users who come upon oiled birds and other wildlife from the Gulf Spill can can send the location and a photo to animal rescue networks using a free new iPhone app developed by University of Amherst researchers.

Called MoGO, for Mobile Gulf Observatory, the app is free and was funded in part from the National Fish and Wildlife Foundation.

Researchers hope the MoGO app will draw on the large network of “citizen scientists” who are actively looking for ways to help save wildlife along the 14,000 miles of northern Gulf coastline that could be impacted from the ongoing BP wellhead disaster.

The new app allows anyone who finds an oiled animal to be linked automatically by the phone to the Wildlife Hotline, and also to contribute photos of the stranded animal and its GPS location coordinates to a database here on campus,” says UMass Amherst wildlife biologist Curt Griffin.

The idea for the new app came to Charlie Schweik, associate director of the National Center for Digital Government, as he listened to yet another depressing story about the Gulf oil spill. Already working on invasive species mapping with computer scientist Deepak Ganesan, an expert in mobile phone and sensor systems, Schweik thought that experience might prove useful for inventorying damage in the Gulf. Smartphones such as the iPhone have several sensors including camera, GPS, audio, video, and acceleration, which all provide valuable data for such an application.

For more information go to www.savegulfwildlife.org.


Hat-tip: MacInTouch Reader.

Read more...

Plant a mango tree. Turn your village green. And save your daughter!

For a refreshing change from all the bad news and dark humor I've been sharing here lately, here's a positive story of grassroots community action in one Indian village to save their daughters (and turn their village green) in a nation still deeply mired in female foeticide, dowry deaths, and myriad daily insults inflicted on women:
The tree-planting has been going on in the village for generations now.

"We heard about it from our fathers and they from their fathers. It has been in the family and the village from ages," says Subhendu Kumar Singh, a school teacher.

"This is our way of meeting the challenges of dowry, global warming and female foeticide. There has not been a single incident yet of female foeticide or dowry death in our village," he says.

His cousin, Shankar Singh, planted 30 trees at the time of his daughter Sneha Surabhi's birth.

Sneha, four, is aware that her father has planted trees in her name; the child says she regularly waters the saplings.

As yet she doesn't know what dowry is, and says the trees will bear fruits for her "to eat".

The village's oldest resident, Shatrughan Prasad Singh, 86, has planted around 500 mango and lychee trees in his 25 acres of land.

His grand-daughters, Nishi and Ruchi, are confident the trees mean their family will have no problem paying for their weddings.

"The whole world should emulate us and plant more trees," says their father Prabhu Dayal Singh.
Read the whole story at news.bbc.co.uk

Read more...

Thursday, June 17, 2010

An American President's plan to end the nation's dependence on foreign oil!

Trust Jon Stewart and the Daily Show to put President Obama's address to the nation into its proper historical perspective! And it is good to see that America's energy policy has remained so consistent across so many presidents from both parties! Isn't it? Just like their foreign policy, as we learned from the other history lesson I shared recently. The more things change...

Oh, and before that brilliant analysis of the President's "new" energy policy talk, Jon also echoed my other peeve with that speech, about prayer in this opening segment to last night's show:

Posted via web from a leaf warbler's gleanings

Read more...

Wednesday, June 16, 2010

The answer is simple: "they're cheap bastards"

I'm no expert on marine ecosystems, much less on the oil industry - but I've not felt much confidence in the official clean-up efforts in the Gulf of Mexico. Now an old veteran of the oil-spill clean-up business confirms a suspicion I've had since first hearing about the large-scale use of dispersants to clean up the oil: that it was more for show than real cleanup. Dispersants, I thought, even the most "natural" ones, are like soap, that work by breaking up the oil into smaller droplets that are less visible, right? So, dumping in a boatload of dispersants (and the less benign commercial ones at that) into a big plume of oil may make the plume disappear - but that's just a visual trick, isn't it? The oil, after all, is still there, and is now dispersed thinly throughout the column of water, is it not? How can that be any easier to clean up? And how is it any better for the poor marine creatures, which might have had a chance of avoiding an oil plume if it was visible, but must now swim through the dispersed, invisible, oil? Especially if it is also mixed up with toxic chemicals now. Are we really sacrificing real environmental values for aesthetic reasons?

My instinct may not have been wrong, suggests ScienceBlogger Christie Wilcox, whose grandpa happens to be a veteran with a career spent designing ways to clean up after the mess of the oil industry. And some of the "expensive" technology he's helped develop to clean up spills are in use in other parts of the world. Just not in the Gulf. Because "they're cheap bastards". Here's an excerpt from the longer blog post about dispersants - but you really should read the entire essay:
Why doesn't the Gulf have the "firehouse mentality" of areas like Puget Sound? Why haven't they identified the most vulnerable areas and stationed cleanup equipment there, provided up to date training for cleanup personnel, and generally prepared for this kind of disaster?

The answer is simple. As my grandpa phrased it, "they're cheap bastards."

The lack of foresight and constant corner cutting by BP led to this disaster. But what's worse is that they continue to botch the containment and cleanup of the billions of gallons of oil that their mistakes have spilled.

"The real issue," my grandfather explained to me, "is that they don't care about solving the problem." By they, he wasn't just referring to BP. He was referring to all of the oil companies in the Gulf and the government regulators that are supposed to be ensuring that oil drilling and transport occurs safely. "They throw dispersants on the oil. Do you know what dispersants do? They make the oil neutrally buoyant. Dispersed oil winds up in the water column and, therefore, cannot be deflected by floating booms or harvested with oil skimmers. They make the surface look cleaner, but they don't do a damned thing to actually clean up the oil."

Essentially, dispersants are soaps. They emulsify oil, breaking up up and allowing it to mix into water. The idea behind dispersants is that by breaking up the oil and putting it in the water column, it will be degraded faster by the microorganisms that naturally degrade oils and keeping the oil from coating the shoreline.

Starting in May, the US has been spraying oil dispersants at the spill like mad, despite concerns raised by many related to potential dispersant impact on wildlife and fisheries, environment, aquatic life, and public health. The EPA further approved injection of these dispersants directly at the the leak site to break up the oil before it reaches the surface. By the end of may, over 600,000 gallons of dispersants have been applied on the surface, with another 55,000 gallons applied underwater. The two main dispersants being used, Corexit EC9500A and EC9527A are neither the least toxic, nor the most effective, among the dispersants approved by the Environmental Protection Agency. In fact, the UK has banned their use entirely. When BP was asked why they aren't using better dispersants, they said that Corexit was 'what they had available.'

The bigger question, though, is why are they using dispersants at all. Multiple studies after the Exxon Valdez spill found that dispersants, detergents, and hot water cleaning of shoreline cause substantially more mortality than oil itself. Even before the Exxon spill, scientists knew that "dispersant-oil mixtures are more toxic than the dispersant alone, and many-fold more toxic than the crude oil." While better and safer detergents are being developed, their long-term toxicity and effectiveness is still completely unknown, making them risky to use in such high quantities as BP is.

The way my grandpa sees it, the so-called cleanup of the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill isn't about being effective or safe, it's about looking like they're doing something. The goal is to make it less visible so the public forgets that it's happening. It's all about PR.

Read more...

Do we applaud when a President merely comes close to speaking the truth?

Or should we really be holding his feet to the fire until he does acknowledge the stark truth? And does so with a kick to the nation's collective butt so we can begin to at last face up to the real challenges of weaning this economy off oil, rather than applying more palliatives that were too little too late several decades ago! I was deeply disappointed by President Obama's address to the nation last night, for this was supposed to be the transformative leader who was going to change this country - and he couldn't even do what mild-mannered Carter did 30 years ago?! And the end of the speech really left me gasping in astonishment - for here was the US President telling us to hang our hopes on prayer, "...that a hand may guide us through the storm towards a brighter day!" Huh?! Wasn't that supposed to be your hand, Mr. Obama? Isn't that pretty much why we elected you - to guide us through the storm towards a brighter day?!

As for the substance of the speech - and how many ways it fell far short of what it should have been - Sharon Astyk zeroes on on the key point, which is that this leader of leaders is simply unwilling to lead us away from the post-peak-oil chasm looming right in front of us, unwilling to even tell us that plain truth in a way that only he can to make a nation sit up and take notice. He came close, agonizingly disappointingly close, but couldn't bring himself to make the real jump:
Obama doesn't explain that most renewables are less energy-dense than oil or natural gas - that it isn't a 1-1 transition, one solar panel or wind turbine for X barrels of oil, but that we need more renewables, and have to run faster and faster to keep up. Obama doesn't explain that at every stage in the renewable transition, we depend on stable prices for oil, coal and natural gas - that we don't make solar panels with solar panels, but with fossil fuels, and that shifts in price can change the economic equation dramatically.

It would have been too much to ask for all this information - the best presidential speeches are pithy. And it would also be too much to ask Obama to admit that it is only now, when people are asking "where the heck were you during this spill" that he's committing publically to fulfilling his promises, only now that he's talking about our energy limits, after approving increased offshore drilling and discussing the way the magic oil off our coasts would fix our problems. It is only now that we've already started sacrificing that he's ready to call for sacrifice. And it all depends on language that implies that we can keep everything largely the way we want it to be - that costs will be largely economic, that a clean energy economy is something that will look like our own, that this isn't going to hurt too badly, that the economy can recover and we can have a low-cost transition and a "victory" that gets us all the things we dream of.

And there was a time when all that was true. When Jimmy Carter was making essentially the same speech Obama just did, only in a cardigan, that was entirely feasible. It was almost certainly doable in the 1980s, and probably into the early 1990s. Now it is not. And Obama didn't tell us about the most basic problem - that the speech he just gave is precisely the kind of speech that has been part of the process of not doing anything. That when George W. Bush said we had to get off foreign oil, and Bill Clinton said we had to get off foreign oil that they too talked about clean energy economies and incentives and making a better world for our kids.

And it isn't that they didn't necessarily even mean it. It is that the oil-addicted culture of America is so deeply dependent on fossil fuels and the economic growth they power that no leader, left or right has ever been able to figure out how to do this shift meaningfully - once we passed the critical moments at which we could have powered a smooth transition, the reality of making words energy - the economic and personal costs, the change required in our culture, those were too big to conquer.

The speech that needs to be given hasn't happened yet, and every year it gets harder to give. It begins with the classic acknowledgement that good physicians give "this is going to hurt." And it explains why - why the greater good comes from endurance. It begins acknowledging that everyone wasted a golden opportunity, and that now our choices are governed by material physical realities - that we face the pain of living with what is possible, rather than what is desirable. It includes both a call to build what renewable energies we can, and also the acknowledgement that we will not be living anything like the present American way of life. It involves a real call to sacrifice - the kind of sacrifice past generations endured in incredibly difficult times, the kinds of sacrifice that cost them a great deal, but for a vastly greater goal. It probably involves unpalatable words like "rationing." It will involve admitting fault and responsibility, and then moving on, telling the public what they need to know, but also engaging them in the project of creating a future for their children and grandchildren.

Read more...

Will the wolves of Greater Yellowstone and northern Rockies survive their day in court?

That's the question raised in an email I just received from the Save Wolves campaign of the Defenders of Wildlife reporting from the court battle on right now to prevent the impending slaughter of still recovering wolf populations in the Greater Yellowstone and northern Rockies region straddling the wild-west states of Idaho, Montana, and Wyoming. Read more about the issues and the court case on the Greater Yellowstone Coalition's website. Note, again, how the Obama administration - under his Interior Secretary Salazar - has basically inherited the Bush administration's stance on this issue! I had ranted about the callousness of this developed country's attitude towards the wolves two years ago - and how we all Hoped that Change would come (on this as on so many other fronts) once the Bush era was over. Not much sign of that yet, particularly in Obama's Interior Department, as amply documented by Rolling Stone this week. So the more things change, the more they stay the same...

While you are lamenting the opportunities lost and mandate squandered by Obama, watch the following video and read the Defenders' petition below for ways you might contribute towards staving off the wolf hunt this fall.  


Save America's Wolves
Future of Wolves
at Stake

Young Idaho Wolf (www.defenders.org)
A judge could rule at any time on the future of wolves in Greater Yellowstone and the northern Rockies...but win or lose, our work for wolves will continue.
Help Defenders ensure a lasting future for wolves in Greater Yellowstone and the northern Rockies with a monthly gift of as little as $5 a month (17 cents per day!).

Make a monthly gift for wolves

Dear Madhusudan,
Thanks to the support of caring people like you, I was at the courthouse in Missoula, Montana yesterday fighting for wolves. 
It’s been a long and hard battle -- and the judge could rule at any time on whether to restore vital federal protections for still-recovering wolves in the Greater Yellowstone and northern Rockies region.
Inside the courtroom, each side had 90 minutes to present their case to the judge. Our lead attorney was the first to take the stage, addressing key questions from the judge. 
There was even a bit of drama in the courtroom: One of the lawyers fighting for wolves fainted during her arguments to the judge! She's fine -- it just goes to show how hard she's been working to help save these wolves.
Outside the courtroom, anti-wolf protesters made their presence felt with signs saying “Kill Wolves” and labeling Defenders as “terrorists.”
This court battle is pivotal to the future of wolves in the Greater Yellowstone and northern Rockies and a ruling could come at any time. But win or lose, our work to ensure a lasting future for wolves in the West will not end at the courtroom doors.
Please consider becoming a Wildlife Guardian with a small monthly gift to help save the lives of wolves in Greater Yellowstone and the northern Rockies and other wildlife and their homes.
Anti-wolf vigilantes are preparing to take matters into their own hands. A post on one extremist website instructs visitors on how to poison wolves with commonly available products.1 Andstrychnine-laced sausages -- possibly left for wolves by forest trails -- have already poisoned several dogs in Idaho.2
This charged atmosphere makes Defenders’ work all the more important. We’re not only fighting in court, but we’re also busy on the ground, working to save the lives of the wolves you and I have fought so hard to protect.
Defenders is collaborating with ranchers and livestock producers to reduce conflicts with wolves.We’re countering the anti-wolf lies and extreme rhetoric in the media. We’re mobilizing tens of thousands of activists from across the country. And we’re working to bring lawless wolf poachers to justice.
A lasting future for wolves in the West won’t be made with just one court decision. It will take years of ongoing hard work and determination. Will you help with a monthly gift?
Sincerely,

Mike Senatore
Vice President, Conservation Law
Defenders of Wildlife
P.S. Please become a Wildlife Guardian online today or call 1-877-682-9401 to help provide the vital support we’ll need in the days ahead to save the lives of wolves and other wildlife.
Notes:
1 http://www.keci.com/Anti-wolf-website-angers-conservationists/7465687
2 http://www.krem.com/news/local/Dog-dies-after-eating-sausage-on-trail-92560964.html
Defenders Home | Privacy Policy | Contact Us | Donate Now

Read more...

Will this stop the International Whaling Commission from lifting the ban on whaling?



The Whales and Dolphins Conservation Society sure hopes this new graphic commercial will turn enough stomachs to press the IWC into not lifting the quarter-century ban on commercial whaling when they meet in Agadir, Morocco next week. The NRDC meanwhile, hopes that any agreement will at least include measures to put a permanent end to whaling, eventually. The signs are not that hopeful, however. You can try to register your protest electronically via the WCDS.


[Hat-tip: Ananthakrishnan Gopalkrishnan]

Read more...

Tuesday, June 15, 2010

When a leopard is no longer welcome on a campus dedicated to wildlife conservation...

...how then, can my alma mater, situated on the edge of a national park, preach to others living on the margins of protected areas that they must tolerate wildlife? How can officials advocate harsh punishments for desperate villagers for burning forests or poisoning wildilfe when they themselves act so boorishly towards a single leopard nursing her cub?

While the official response to a single leopard and her cub showing up occasionally on and around campus was perhaps predictably over the top, I am glad that so many of my friends and colleagues among the younger wildlife biologists in India have risen in anger to register their protest. You can start with this blog post and comments therein to follow the discussion. I hope this incident becomes a lesson in walking the talk for WII - but am not holding my breath (that much cynicism I picked up while a student at WII two decades ago). Whether the current administration there mends its ways, i don't know, but the next generation of students must at least learn to practice what we preach, and learn this lesson:

Biodiversity conservation, like charity, must begin at home! For is there any higher form of charity than that towards other species?

Posted via web from a leaf warbler's gleanings

Read more...

Monday, June 14, 2010

Another coast, another oil "leak", many more lives destroyed, turtle and human alike...

NEW DELHI, June 12, 2010 (IPS) - In mid-April this year, MV Malavika, a cargo ship of the Essar Shipping Corporation, a major sea logistics firm in India, leaked an estimated eight tonnes of furnace oil after being struck by a barge near the Gopalpur port on the eastern Indian coast of Orissa.

Within a few hours, a huge slick had washed up along the Olive Ridley Turtle nesting beach at Rushikulya, a major turtle nesting site in Orissa, where over 150,000 turtles had nested just a few weeks earlier. The fear of the impact this would have on the turtle nests was confirmed about a month later.

In spite of claims by authorities that the beach had been cleaned up, local researchers say that more than half the eggs laid could have been damaged by the oil spill.

"This is the first time we’ve experienced a slick of this kind, and the damage has been immense," says Rabindranath Sahu, the secretary of Rushikulya Sea Turtle Protection Committee, of the oil spill in Orissa. Only about three kilometres of the beach had been cleaned up whereas the turtle nesting had occurred along a five km stretch, he tells IPS.

The livelihoods of nearly 10 fishing villages in the area had been completely destroyed as the fish catch had collapsed while salt production units in the area had to shut operations for about 20 days, he adds.

That report of a lesser oil spill, comes from Pankaj Sekhsaria, who writes about the environment and conservation issues in the archipelagos of the Andamans and of protected areas in India, and whose blog you should be reading anyway.

Posted via web from a leaf warbler's gleanings

Read more...

On History's hamster wheel: 40 Earth Days later, how far have we really come?

Earth Day, the event that symbolizes the environmental movement capturing the public attention massively for the first time in America, started in the wake of an oil disaster, off the Santa Barbara coast in California, 40 years ago last April. It has since become a worldwide phenomenon - as recounted in this report in Hindi

And here we are again, with another massive oil disaster marking the 40th anniversary of this significant movement (so why aren't we calling this the Earth Day Oil Disaster?). Can the current disaster finally kick us off these bad habits, or are we condemned to repeat history as tragedy?

Walk through the interactive timeline of progress in the 40 years on the NRDC's Earth Day website. Pause on 1972, and let the words of triumph sink in... progress...

Here's another look at these 40 years of progress in America:

After finding the video I posted earlier today, with Robert Redford speaking about the Gulf oil disaster, I went browsing through other NRDC videos on YouTube. Amid some good stuff, I found these Earth Day videos, posted mere weeks before the BP explosion. Watch and weep.





Read more...

Some historical context on the Gulf Oil Disaster and a call for action from Robert Redford

Read more...

On the unfortunate tendency for American minerals to be found buried under foreign soils... a history lesson

Uh Oh!!

The Americans have found large deposits of valuable minerals in Afghanistan, reports the newspaper of record (and empire)!!

Poor, poor, coulda-been-rich but now destined to forever remain poor, Afghanistan!!

So now, since it should be obvious now that the Americans are never leaving Afghanistan (how could they, morally, abandon all these minerals stuck under an unstable country?!), now seems like a good time for my American friends (and other citizens of global empire) to get an important history lesson.

Specifically, the history of what happens when an economically valuable natural resource just happens to be found stuck under the soil of some poor developing country (especially if said country lies in or around the Middle East like Afghanistan).


The History of Oil, as told, inimitably, entertainingly, by Rob Newman! Enjoy right here, in 9 parts, or buy the DVD via Rob Newman's own website or on Amazon UK (seeing as how the US Amazon store doesn't seem to carry the title!).


And remember this lesson the next time you hear about the American plan to bring democracy to Afghanistan!

Part 1:
Part 2:
Part 3:
Part 4:
Part 5:
Part 6:
Part 7:
Part 8:
Part 9:

Read more...

Sunday, June 13, 2010

How I ended up here...

Read more...

Saturday, June 12, 2010

Saving the big cat: can tigers and people co-exist?

A big question, examined in 30 minutes on CNN-IBN last April.

Here's part 1:

Visit ibnlive.in.com for parts 2, 3, and 4.

 

Posted via web from a leaf warbler's gleanings

Read more...

Friday, June 11, 2010

McKibben on how the media is missing the real drama of BP's oil disaster

In an excellent essay on the real meaning of the Deepwater Horizon blowout that the media seem to be entirely missing, Bill McKibben reminds us:

When a well started spewing oil off Santa Barbara in 1969, it spurred the first Earth Day, which in turn launched the environmental movement and a fundamental questioning of the balance between humans and the rest of nature. It turned out, in other words, to be a real Moment.

And goes on to suggest why this might be another such Moment, but one the media isn't paying any attention to:

Let’s think about the stories that are suggested by this trouble.

One has something to do with Peak Oil. BP has gone to all this trouble for a well that taps into what they now think may be 100 million barrels of oil. And that’s…5 days supply for the U.S? Does that give you any sense of the precariousness of the arrangements undergirding our economy right at the moment?

Another -- even more important -- has to do with global warming. Let’s assume that the oil from the Deepwater Horizon made it safely onshore and was refined and then burned in the gas tank of your car. What then? Well, the CO2 in the atmosphere would be doing at least as much damage as the oil spreading across the Gulf. Consider the following things that have happened since the Deepwater exploded:
  • Asia and Southeast Asia have each recorded their hottest temperatures ever -- 129 degrees in Pakistan, and 117 in Burma. India is having the worst heatwave since the British started keeping records -- people are dying by the hundreds.
  • We’ve seen the biggest rainstorms ever recorded in lots of places, from Nashville to Guatemala -- the clear result of an atmosphere made 5% wetter because warm air holds more water vapor than cold. 
  • Satellite data has shown that Arctic ice is now melting even faster than in the record year of 2007. 
  • NASA has released new statistics showing that the past 12 months were the warmest on record, and that 2010 is almost certain to set the title for the warmest calendar year yet. 
All of these, it seems to me, could be considered parts of the Deepwater Horizon story, because they demonstrate that fossil fuel is everywhere dirty. They change the political question from “is Obama angry enough” to “can Obama lead a credible fight for real energy and climate legislation?” More to the point, they connect with the mood of existential despair and anger that the oil spill has set off across the country. People are sad and bitter only in part because they see those pelicans oiled; mostly, they sense correctly that our leaders have yet to deal with what is clearly the biggest problem we face, the transition off of fossil fuel. 

The questions that the Gulf spill raises, in other words, go well beyond: How big an idiot is Tony Hayward? What will happen to the tourist economy of the Gulf? How cool is James Cameron’s minisub? The questions are more like: How out of balance with the natural world are we? And what would it require to get back in balance?

Posted via web from a leaf warbler's gleanings

Read more...

A Field of Birds

And you can do your part to save these birds, for a little more than the cost of a latte.

Posted via web from a leaf warbler's gleanings

Read more...

Thursday, June 10, 2010

Biology Overload in the latest Scientia Pro Publica


I know I'm not always diligent about noting blog carnivals here, even when my postings are part of a carnival! Can't promise I'll be consistent about that in the future either. But if you are looking for some good science writing to read this summer, you could do worse than reading the weekly roundup in the Scientia Pro Publica carnival, which I have hosted in the past, and try to contribute to when I can. You'll find this week's edition, which came out on June 7, at The Dichotomous Trekkie 2.0, with an overload of biological posts! What fun! And it even includes my recent rant about evolution not being a ladder. So what are you waiting for? Go visit the carnival now!

Read more...

Government? Regulating corporations? It's Complicated!



Meanwhile, a full 26 years, and some 25,000 human lives later, an Indian court yesterday convicted 8 Union Carbide officials (all Indian, btw, working for this multinational giant corporation) for their role in the nocturnal gas leak that is one of the worst industrial disasters ever. Yay!! Justice at last!!
And the court then sentenced them (at least the 7 convicts still alive today) to the harsh harsh punishment of 2 years imprisonment and a fine each of ~$2125!

That'll teach them! Hell yeah!!! BP take heed!!!!

Corporations can't go about doing whatever they frakking please for profit when you have such governments and judiciaries keeping a sharp eye on them, ready to slap them down! On the wrist. For killing 3500 people overnight, and another 20,000+ in the subsequent 26 years.

Isn't it great then, that corporations are deemed to have similar (or greater) rights of personhood as human citizens in matters of, oh, buying elections, lobbying congress, and other routine ways of turning democracy into fascism. But they cannot be held liable for more than pennies for all the damage they may inflict on people or planet in the pursuit of profits, especially short-term, because after all, profits trump human beings. Every time.

Now, is that so complicated?

Read more...

Saturday, June 5, 2010

The Tree Planter's Waltz

A waltz we should all be dancing on this World Environment Day!

Found this via Baba Brinkman's Facebook page, where I also learnt that he has personally planted 1,046,105 trees!!

Posted via web from a leaf warbler's gleanings

Read more...

Surprising feats of navigation and endurance



Imagine traveling halfway around the world, across the biggest ocean on the planet, under your own muscle power, without GPS, inflight meals, or any of the accoutrements of modern life we may take for granted. And doing it twice a year, year after year. That is what this Bar-tailed Godwit and a number of other remarkable birds have evolved to do, in a feat most of us pay no thought to as we go about our own mundane lives.

I blogged about the Bar-tailed Godwit a few years ago, when their non-stop flight across the Pacific Ocean was first observed using satellite telemetry. Last week, the New York Times published an update on their, and a few other species', astonishing migrations in a typically excellent essay by Carl Zimmer accompanying the above interactive feature - which you'll have to visit to see the maps just barely visible here (an artifact of how Posterous chose to pull the images via its bookmarklet - and while on that, I continue to be impressed with this blogging platform, to the point of considering switching over completely; what do you think?).

Read more...

Thursday, June 3, 2010

Where in the world is the Yellow-billed Magpie? Help us find out this weekend!

What a handsome corvid, the Yellow-billed Magpie. How curiously restricted, its global range:ResearchBlogging.org
 
This lovely bird is another one I consider myself fortunate to have seen up close (e.g., when I took the above pictures in Pinnacles National Monument recently), given that it is one of those rare endemic species found only in a particular small corner of the world. This one, as you can see in the above map (from the Birds of North America account for the species), happens to be restricted to parts of Central California, west of the Sierra Nevada mountains, along the San Joaquin Valley all the way west to the Pacific coast. You can find a more dynamic, birder-generated current map of sightings via eBird.

The distribution range has shrunk historically with humans taking over much of its habitat for farms and suburbia, but numbers may have been relatively stable until the turn of this millennium. It has remained a species of concern given its limited range, and how much we humans covet its habitat. Nevertheless, the bird appears resourceful enough to have adapted to living amid human enterprise in some of the world's richest farmland in the valley and the sprawl of the San Francisco Bay Areas! Must be those clever corvid genes that have made the bird flexible enough to deal with some of the insults from us.

Our insults have run quite the gamut, including direct loss of habitat, concerted poisoning and bounty hunting campaigns because the bird is thought to be an agricultural pest (especially for the fruit/nut crops common around here, I think), and most recently, the arrival of West Nile Virus (WNV) in California. That last has landed the Magpie on Audubon's watchlist, for it has turned out to be perhaps the most susceptible to the virus. The population may be declining in recent years - but we don't really know what its status is with any certainty! Remarkable that, given how many excellent biologists live and work in and around the species' range at some of the world's top universities!

And I include myself among the ornithologists in the region who would like to keep a closer eye on this species. When I arrived in Fresno, West Nile Virus had just hit the state, and I grew curious about the range of the Yellow-billed Magpie because it wasn't to be found in or around Fresno! The distribution map intrigued me when I first found it because the bird is reasonably abundant in suburban / rural / farmland habitats north of Fresno county all the way up to Sacramento; and along the coast range to the west its range extends farther to the south as well. Yet, for some reason, it wasn't to be found in Fresno, even in habitat that I would be hard pressed to tell apart from areas 50-100 km north of us where the species is common! I haven't found a satisfactory explanation for this gap in its distribution, for I'm sure it used to be here, but not any more. Some oldtime bird/wildlife watchers in Fresno have hinted that the species was actively exterminated from the county because of a bounty on its pretty head several decades ago when it was considered a pest! That might explain its disappearance, but its not clear why it hasn't come back. Is it still being hunted/poisoned by farmers? Or has the habitat been altered enough to deter recolonization, presuming northern populations are productive enough (which they may not be). I suspect there is enough in those questions for a potential masters thesis, but haven't managed to find a student sufficiently motivated to go chase them. Know any?

Meanwhile, recent studies at UC Davis have focused on modeling habitat needs, on the effects of WNV on the birds, and on loss of genetic diversity through inbreeding. Those studies (follow the link for more info) have drawn upon help from citizen scientists who can report sightings of live and dead birds, the latter being collected for WNV screening. Visit Magpiemonitor.org for more on participation and results.

Right now, we all get a chance to help more broadly as well, by participating in a survey this weekend, organized by California Audubon and eBird. Here's the invitation:

Yellow-billed Magpie survey set for June 4-7, 2010

If we want to help the Yellow-billed Magpie survive, we need to know where it is living and in what numbers. And that’s where you can help. Audubon California is sponsoring a four-day statewide survey of Yellow-billed Magpies enlisted the help of volunteer birders.

Taking part is simple: All you need to do is log into eBird and record your observations.

Shortly after the survey, we’ll tally up the results and every participant will receive a report of the findings. Audubon California will use these findings to guide our conservation efforts for this bird.

Click on the links to the left to learn more and to take part in this important volunteer project.

I hope you can participate in the survey on what promises to be a nice weekend for birdwatching in the valley. At least, if you are out and about anywhere in this species range this weekend, I hope you will keep en eye out for this not inconspicuous bird and report any sightings.
Happy Magpie tracking!

Reference:
Reynolds, M. (1995). Yellow-billed Magpie (Pica nuttalli) The Birds of North America Online DOI: 10.2173/bna.180

Read more...

About this blog

A blog about studying and applying evolutionary ecology in human-dominated landscapes from the Reconciliation Ecology Lab at California State University, Fresno

Copyright

<Creative Commons License Except where noted otherwise, all original work here is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 License.

Blog Archive

Live visitor map

How many readers?

web tracker


Unique visitors

  © Blogger templates The Professional Template by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP